Response to "eworkhard", part four...
I will eventually reply. However, I am again busy and it may take a few weeks. In addition, you say many things, but you are not backing up your arguments. 5 minute thoughts with a couple of googled links? You are not debating science with science. I assumed that is what you wanted. BTW when you say you no longer want to talk about Dawkins, does that mean you no longer care about him? Remember that was your first point that I criticized.
I'm not backing up my arguments? Fuck you. Have you even visited the links I've put up? I'm not the one who's not backing up my arguments.
Here. I suggest you take a good look at that. Should answer many of your questions. Of course, I'm guessing it doesn't fit in with your thinking, so you'll ignore it.
I stopped arguing about Dawkins because of your damn rambilings on him.
Find some proper arguments.
I'm not backing up my arguments? Fuck you. Have you even visited the links I've put up? I'm not the one who's not backing up my arguments.
Here. I suggest you take a good look at that. Should answer many of your questions. Of course, I'm guessing it doesn't fit in with your thinking, so you'll ignore it.
I stopped arguing about Dawkins because of your damn rambilings on him.
Find some proper arguments.
Labels: Creationism, Creationist



1 Comments:
At 18 January, 2007 11:50,
Anonymous said…
Yep, Google used far to often to back up spurious arguments - not surprising through when there is so little evidence to back the religious argument up!
Post a Comment
<< Home